Contentu
Back to blog
ProductivityWellbeingAI & Tech

Productivity Is Stealing Your Life — Why Doing More Is Not Living Better

Keynes predicted we would work 15 hours a week. We work more than ever. Productivity stopped being a means to live and became the definition of being alive.

Santiago Vini Garcia

Santiago Vini Garcia

Published on January 1, 1970

7 min read0 views
Productivity Is Stealing Your Life — Why Doing More Is Not Living Better

In 1930, economist John Maynard Keynes made a prediction that today sounds like science fiction: by the year 2030, humanity would work 15 hours a week. Technological progress, Keynes said, was going to free us from the burden of repetitive work and give us something no previous generation had in abundance: free time.

We're four years away from 2030. Technology advanced exactly as Keynes predicted. We have machines that do in seconds what used to take weeks. And yet, we work more hours than in the 1950s. We sleep less. We rest worse. And when we finally have a free moment, we fill it with more tasks because sitting down to do nothing feels like a sin.

Keynes got something fundamental wrong. He assumed that when technology gave us the possibility to work less, we would choose to work less. What happened was the opposite. Technology gave us the capacity to produce more, and instead of using that capacity to free up time, we used it to fill that time with more production. The problem was never technological. It was cultural. At some point, producing stopped being a means to live and became the very definition of what it means to be alive.

How We Got Here

The obsession has old roots. The Protestant ethic equated hard work with divine virtue and laziness with sin. But at least back then work had a spiritual meaning. Today we mix coffee with focus pills to meet deadlines nobody will remember in three months, and we do it convinced we're doing something important.

The real transformation happened after the Industrial Revolution. While Henry Ford's factories focused on improving systems (assembly lines, processes, machinery), with the arrival of office work in the 1960s the burden shifted from the system to the individual. It was no longer about making the factory work better. It was about squeezing more out of each worker.

And here we are. 65% of Brits and 63% of Americans consider productivity their number one priority in life. Above having a healthy body, above having more money, above being happy. People would rather be productive than happy. That tells you everything you need to know about the level of brainwashing we're living through.

In Latin America the numbers are worse. 75% of workers in Mexico have experienced burnout, the highest rate in the world according to the WHO. In Argentina, 69% of professionals report working outside their work hours. In Colombia, 58% admit to taking medication to stay alert. These aren't pandemic data. These are data from any given Tuesday.

The Productivity Hack Trap

There's an entire industry dedicated to selling you the solution to a problem it feeds. Butter coffee. Time management apps. Pomodoro techniques. Habit journals. Five-step morning routines. Each new productivity "hack" is one more task on your to-do list.

I know people who spend more time configuring their productivity system than producing anything with it. They spend the morning adjusting their Notion, the afternoon reviewing habit metrics across three different apps, and the evening reading articles about how to be more efficient tomorrow. It's the equivalent of sharpening the knife all day and never cutting anything.

And the greatest irony: even rest became productive. Meditation apps gamify mental peace with streaks and levels. Power naps are timed to the minute to "maximize cognitive recovery." Vacations are planned in detail to "make the most of every moment." In Argentina, 82% of young professionals feel they need to monetize their hobbies to consider them valuable. The hobby you did because you enjoyed it now has to be a side hustle or it doesn't count.

Even leisure became a checkbox.

The Tree That Was Saved by Being Useless

There's a Taoist story I like to tell. A carpenter was walking through the forest looking for wood for his furniture. He passed in front of an enormous tree, twisted, full of knots. He looked at it, mentally calculated what he could do with it, and kept walking. The tree was useless for carpentry. Too irregular, too unpredictable, too difficult to work with.

The carpenter kept looking for straight, functional trees. He cut them down one by one. Made furniture with them. Sold them. Went back to the forest for more.

The twisted tree stayed there. Over time, its irregular branches began to shade travelers who rested beneath it on hot days. Its knots became shelter for birds and insects. Its presence enriched the landscape in a way no piece of furniture could replicate. Those who passed by stopped to look at it, to sit underneath, to think.

The tree served a purpose the carpenter, with his utility and production mindset, couldn't see. The tree didn't produce anything. It simply was.

I've spent years thinking about that tree when I feel the pressure to produce more.

The One-Legged Stool

In the EMC³ method I work with three axes that need to be in balance for your life to function with coherence: Energy, Matter, and Connection. Productivity lives on the Matter axis. It's important. Creating things, building projects, generating income, materializing ideas. All of that has value.

The problem appears when Matter devours the other two axes.

When you sacrifice your Energy (your health, your vitality, your creativity, your capacity to feel alive) to be more productive, you're financing your current performance with the health of your future self. It's like taking out a loan you'll have to pay back with interest. And the interest on deteriorated health is brutal.

When you sacrifice your Connection (your relationships, your presence with the people you love, your sense of belonging) to finish a project, you're gaining completed tasks and losing the things that give meaning to completing them. In Brazil, 63% of workers report sacrificing time with their family to maintain their work productivity. Think about that. They're producing more to give a better life to a family they see less and less.

It's like building a stool with one leg and wondering why you keep falling.

What Real Productivity Should Measure

A while ago I stopped counting completed tasks and started asking myself different questions at the end of the day. Whether I had at least one moment of real connection with someone. Whether I did something that put me in a flow state, where time disappeared. Whether at the end of the day I have energy to do something I enjoy and not just to collapse on the couch and scroll.

The days where I complete fewer tasks but keep all three axes in balance are consistently better than the days where I complete 47 things and end up staring at the wall.

Productivity should be measured in life generated. In quality of experience. In the capacity to be present when you're with someone, to create something that bears your personal mark, to keep your body and mind in a state that allows you to enjoy what you build.

The data point that concerns me most from everything I found researching this topic is this: the people who report the highest levels of productivity are the same ones who report the lowest levels of satisfaction with their personal lives.

The Matter Axis Exists for a Reason. So Do the Other Two.

I'm not saying you should stop working or abandon your projects. Creating and contributing is part of what makes us human. The Matter axis exists for a reason. What I'm saying is that if your productivity system leaves you without energy for the things that matter to you and without time for the people you love, your system is broken. And it won't be fixed with another app or another hack.

It gets fixed by stopping. By looking at your life from above, as Marcus Aurelius would, and honestly asking yourself what you're producing, for whom, and at what cost.

The answer to that question is usually uncomfortable. But it's a good place to start recalibrating.

At Contentu we talk about productivity from a perspective that includes all three axes, not just the Matter one. If this resonates, find us at www.contentu.co.

Share article
Santiago Vini Garcia

By

Santiago Vini Garcia

Author of The Digital Alchemist Path and Quantum Clarity. Writes about digital business, personal transformation, and the intersection of technology and human connection.

Comments

Log in to leave a comment.